Humanity & Justice

Write a 3–4-page summary and analysis of your experiential learning after completing at least four Positive Psychology Journal activities.

To deepen your understanding, you are encouraged to consider the questions below and discuss them with a fellow learner, a work associate, an interested friend, or a member of the business community.

What types of positive interactions are you most comfortable providing in your relationships? What types of positive interactions do you most appreciate from someone in a loving relationship? Based on this information, what steps could you take to increase your chances for flourishing relationships?
How could focusing on developing your branches of emotional intelligence increase your well-being and flourishing in your life?
Application to Personal, Professional, or Social Issues
Summarize how what you learned from the activities and the study of character strengths for this assessment may be applied to personal issues in your life, professional issues as in an educational or work setting, or social issues such as aging, mental health versus mental illness, and happiness and well-being.
Analyze the strengths and weaknesses (advantages and disadvantages, pros and cons) of applying what you learned or the character strengths studied to the personal, professional, or social issues.
Include supportive research findings related to these topics (1–2 scholarly resources).
Be sure to use APA formatted in-text citations and references for the activity tools you select and cite all scholarly sources where appropriate. Your writing should be scholarly and professional, using proper APA formatting and style.

Additional Requirements
Written communication: Written communication should be free of errors that detract from the overall message.
APA formatting: Your paper should be formatted according to current APA style and formatting.
Length: Your paper should be 3–4 typed and double-spaced pages, not including cover sheet and reference page.
References: Your paper should include 1–2 properly cited scholarly resources.
Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.
Humanity and Justice Scoring Guide
VIEW SCORING GUIDE
Use the scoring guide to enhance your learning.

Print
Humanity and Justice Scoring Guide
CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED
Explain reflections and insights related to experiential learning activities. Does not explain reflections or insights related to experiential learning activities. Lists but does not explain reflections or insights related to experiential learning activities. Explains reflections and insights related to experiential learning activities. Analyzes reflections and insights related to experiential learning activities; identifies areas for further development.
Summarize how the study of character strengths may be applied to personal, professional, or social issues. Does not summarize how the study of character strengths may be applied to personal, professional, or social issues. Summarizes how the study of character strengths may be applied to personal, professional, or social issues, but applications are unclear or inappropriate. Summarizes how the study of character strengths may be applied to personal, professional, or social issues. Summarizes how the study of character strengths may be applied to personal, professional, or social issues; identifies areas of uncertainty related to these applications.
Describe the relationship between experiential activities or character strengths and optimal human functioning. Does not describe the relationship between experiential activities or character strengths and optimal human functioning. Describes the relationship between some experiential activities or character strengths and optimal human functioning; or relationship described is inaccurate. Describes the relationship between experiential activities or character strengths and optimal human functioning. Describes the relationship between experiential activities or character strengths and optimal human functioning; provides examples as illustrations.
Analyze the strengths and weaknesses of applying character strengths to the personal, professional, or social issues. Does not identify the strengths and weaknesses of applying character strengths to the personal, professional, or social issues. Identifies but does not analyze the strengths and weaknesses of applying character strengths to the personal, professional, or social issues. Analyzes the strengths and weaknesses of applying character strengths to the personal, professional, or social issues. Analyzes the strengths and weaknesses of applying character strengths to the personal, professional, or social issues; predicts outcomes or makes recommendations.
Support analysis with research findings related to topics. Does not identify research findings related to topics. Identifies research findings related to topics but does not use them to support the analysis. Supports analysis with research findings related to topics. Supports analysis with research findings related to topics; incorporates relevant real-world examples or scenarios.
Write coherently to support a central idea with correct grammar, usage, and mechanics as expected of a psychology professional. Writing does not support a central idea and does not use correct grammar, usage, and mechanics as expected of a psychology professional. Writing supports an idea but is inconsistent and contains numerous errors in grammar, usage, and mechanics. Writing coherently supports a central idea with few errors in grammar, usage, and mechanics. Writing is coherent, using evidence to support a central idea with correct grammar, usage, and mechanics, as expected of a psychology professional.
Successfully implement APA style. Does not apply proper APA formatting and style. Written communication is adequate but has some APA errors and inconsistencies. Successfully implements APA style with only minor errors in format. Applies scholarly writing skills and uses proper APA formatting and style in the body of the paper and references list.

In what ways are teamwork and social responsibility related to the character strengths of justice